I want pics of Frank.

- submitted by Anonymous on 02/16/2009

I want pics of Frank.

i want pics of frank and

- submitted by Anonymous on 02/16/2009

i want pics of frank and honey

insane!!

- submitted by Anonymous on 02/16/2009

insane!!

Wow

- submitted by John James on 02/16/2009

OMGosh, Priceless dude! Well done!

RT www.anon-tools.us.tc

Yeah right

- submitted by Stephen on 02/16/2009

She will show up with her lawyer and the cops and restraining order in hand. He will be kicked out of the house with only the clothes he is wearing. She will get all his stuff just because she has a vagina.

in some states adultery

- submitted by Anonymous on 02/16/2009

in some states adultery nullifies womens' presumptive rights. frank may have done this guy a big favor.

HA

- submitted by Anonymous on 02/16/2009

HA

husband or wife?

- submitted by Anonymous on 02/16/2009

What makes you think this card was from the husband? perhaps it was the wife who wrote this message...

I assumed the card was from

- submitted by Anonymous on 02/16/2009

I assumed the card was from the wife.

vaginamony

- submitted by Anonymous on 02/16/2009

"in some states adultery nullifies womens' presumptive rights."

bullsh1t. name one.

the feminist movement has killed that old quaint notion of adultery decades ago. as things stand now, she could have sex with both teams at the superbowl on the 50 yard line, televised on TV, and it would mean nothing in court against her.

the sad truth is that the guy who made that card is most likely going to lose his house in the divorce settlement, and he'll also have to pay alimony and child support (if they have kids).

Women give flowers to men?

- submitted by Anonymous on 02/16/2009

Normally the Husband buys flowers for the wife.

@vaginamony, you're an idiot

- submitted by on 02/16/2009

Uh, adultery committed by either party can nullify claims to a single party's finances. This is because if the adulterous act leads to the divorce whichever party committed the cheating, in fact, loses claim to the other's finances.

The sad truth is you do not know shit about what is involved in the legal aspects of a marriage contract.

I'm in law school btw.

Marriage is archaic

- submitted by Anonymous on 02/16/2009

It's time for the concept of marriage to die. Gone are the days when people lived on farms and needed large families just to survive. Today most people live in apartments or a small houses in the burbs and breeding kids is actually a hindrance, not a benefit.

Plus with things like online dating, facebook, and myspace, it's so easy to hook up that even the most inept can do it. Not only is it unreasonable to expect 2 people to spend their lives together, but it's also a kind of torture. That photo just reeks of the desperation and shame of a dead relationship that is artificially continued because of the obligations of the outdated concept of marriage.

Marriage is a combination of slavery and prostitution and it's time for that archaic tradition to end so people are not trapped in an obligation to love, and they can be free to have the dignity of loving whomever they want.

RE: Marriage is archaic

- submitted by Anonymous on 02/16/2009

Marriage is not archaic. There are still people out there that believe in Marriage. Just because these social sites are becoming more popular with dating does not mean people won't tie the knot. I met my boyfriend online, and I believe in the future we will marry. You create your own reality. My parents are still happily married after 27 years, and I wish to do the same one day.

@law school

- submitted by Anonymous on 02/16/2009

Law school, it sounds like the only law school you'll ever attend is advertised on matchbook covers. The vast majority of states are "no fault" when it comes to adultery, and only a few "at fault" states. So, what vaginamony wrote is absolutely true in most states, like California, for example.

RE: Marriage is not archaic.

- submitted by Anonymous on 02/16/2009

Marriage is to decide independently to live with an equal partner, and to subordinate oneself to the formation of a new subject, a we. You effectively have given up on living life according to your personal desires and submitted to the ignobility of surrendering to someone elses whims.

Marriage is the only adventure open to the cowardly. You're admitting you'll be nothing in life and resigning yourself to the lowliest of all fates: procreation. I have better things to do with my life than spend it in the servitude of children. Let the poor and the stupid breed, I am better than that. Furthermore, I will not be limited by another person, for lovers will sabotage you to keep you from finding another lover, in effect, lovers are dream killers, the legendary succubus.

There's nothing a man can get in marriage that he can't get without a marriage, but women want desperately to get married so they can trap a man into supporting their indolent ass, and then at some point they can file for divorce and collect money if things don't work out.

RE: Marriage archaic

- submitted by Nobel on 02/17/2009

If you really think that you obviously are just a sad lonely man. Marriage goes beyond just having some one to hook up with. Its about having a companion someone you can lean on. No one man or woman is strong enough everyday of their life that they never needed someone else. I am sure you have f**ked a lot of people, good for you but you probably don't have anyone that really cares for you in your life. Would you want your mother to just hook up with a lot of people? I am just baffled by your statements.

To "Re: Marriage is not archaic"

- submitted by Anonymous on 02/17/2009

I'm sure you go through a sting of Barbie Doll types with double digit I.Q.s. Don't know who the "bitch" was that stoned your feelings so badly, but take it to therapy. Though with that attitude you'll make a good used car salesman, a lawyer or a stock broker with a foot thick SEC file when you grow up.

photoshopped.

- submitted by Anonymous on 02/17/2009

photoshopped.

No-fault divorce

- submitted by Anonymous on 02/17/2009

You should have listened to law school. No-fault divorce is an *option* in virtually every state, but so is at-fault divorce. For example if one spouse beats the other, they can be found at-fault and lose the marital property. Likewise, adultery.

On the other hand, "law school" should have known better than to cite a legal credential other than license to practice law...

Live your life as you want

- submitted by Jonhy on 02/17/2009

You gonna fall in love, you gonna marry her. You gonna give her everything in your life that you can. You gonna have a beautiful and smart kid together. You still gonna do everything to make her happy. You are gonna have a job that you hate, so you can bring food to the table. And what happens after 10 years? She's gonna find someone else, forget everything you did for her and leave you...hanging at the same place just like before you met her. So what you can do? Just tell her to fuck off and start a new life. Don't play by anybody's rules anymore. You gonna be stronger, better, smarter. There are way too many people on this planet. It's not worth it to fuck up your life for anyone. I mean anyone.

I mean I suppose you could

- submitted by William Shatner on 02/17/2009

I mean I suppose you could say marriage is a test, or an adventure, shit even a game to see how long or as much of a commitment you can keep, maybe if you keep it forever you'll feel like you've won. I don't think you could really know what it's like unless you happen to be in a position where you feel like you're in love, or whatever feeling you get that you decide to call love. I think that it's not necessarily out of the question that people can really find someone they truly want to spend their entire lives with, and also that people will always feel a need to deviate, stretch their legs and cheating or fuck quitting their job in the middle of their career. Everyone is different everyone has different needs and desires, and I think some of you on here are too close minded to see every angle of the idea of marriage. Opinions are fine but it's ignorant to assume you're "right" about anything.

@Nobel

- submitted by Anonymous on 02/17/2009

"If you really think that you obviously are just a sad lonely man. Marriage goes beyond just having some one to hook up with. Its about having a companion someone you can lean on. No one man or woman is strong enough everyday of their life that they never needed someone else. I am sure you have f**ked a lot of people, good for you but you probably don't have anyone that really cares for you in your life. Would you want your mother to just hook up with a lot of people? I am just baffled by your statements." =========================== 1-Alone does NOT mean lonely. Emotional maturity is the ability to stand alone. Your need to cling to someone is what's sick, not my need to be autonomous. Your maudlin emotional dependence is rather repugnant. It's like you're afraid to be alone... maybe you're just not interesting enough to keep yourself amused.

2-Having a person who "cares for me" comes with the other side of the coin: the oppressive burden, the ball and chain, they are the same person. The hand you hold is the hand that holds you down.

3-mom? I don't own her, she can do as she pleases. Perhaps your mom was too controlling, and now that you're an adult, you'd like to take a turn at controlling her. I won't impose my values on anyone, unlike you, where your sense of "what's right" seems more like a controlling wish of an authoritarian fascist.... or just a limpet desperately searching for a rock on which to cling.

4-baffled by my statements? Yes, it's obvious that we have practically nothing in common. But I've been where you are now, we all go thru it as we grow up, but you'll never be where I am since you have no urge for autonomy, and you don't even see it as an achievement, or as something positive. You might want to take a look at Maslow's hierarchy of needs, if you want to get a glimpse of my reference point. I'm speaking of self-actualization.

aaahh

- submitted by Anonymous on 02/17/2009

the fun it is to watch those argue about things that dont really matter.

Re: Marriage is not archaic

- submitted by Anonymous on 02/17/2009

"I'm sure you go through a sting of Barbie Doll types with double digit I.Q.s. Don't know who the "bitch" was that stoned your feelings so badly, but take it to therapy. Though with that attitude you'll make a good used car salesman, a lawyer or a stock broker with a foot thick SEC file when you grow up."

==============================

1-Barbie Doll types? Yes, the more the merrier. And don't hate them cos they're beautiful. Don't be jealous that they attract men that you can only dream about dating, it's the way of the world. If you spent more time in the gym, you too could get more attention from men.

2-the "bitch" that stoned my feelings so badly? LOL. Do I sound bitter and jaded to you? Sorry, I'm not, it's just the reality of the situation, expressed bluntly. I don't invest myself in one woman, not when there's so many others that always turn my head. If I had a steady girlfriend, I'd cheat on her, so I don't have a girlfriend. I am completely honest and up front: I tell them I'm not looking for a relationship. This way I'm free to do what I would do anyway, but without the guilt and the subterfuge. And the women are free to decide if they want to date me or not on an honest level. I'm not like those men who will say anything to a woman just to get in her pants. But I get laid anyway, and there's no shortage of women who are looking for casual sex. Contrary to popular myth, women actually like sex and don't have to be forced or tricked into it.

3-make a good used car salesman? LOL. Nope, I'm basically an accountant (controller for a small company... you know, AR, AP, GL, payroll, etc). I am a VERY trusted employee, considering all the company's money goes right through my grubby little fingers.

RE: aaahh, and at all

- submitted by Really cool person on 02/17/2009

I agree, but, to start something needless (and I'll be rly annoyed if its ignored), I'm with autonomous man, 'cept I'm not against love. Its fine so long as you don't marry. It is, as aforementioned, an archaic tradition. Today's marrying generation (I'm in the next one fyi) don't see it for the same values as they were seen in the beginning (sound christian don't I). Marriage is nothing anymore.'

I've given up before I even joined the game.

I am the ultimate winner.

"Re: Marriage is not archaic"

- submitted by Anonymous on 02/17/2009

My parents have been married for 30 years and are still disgustingly in love and very happy. I feel sad for you because you have obviously never met someone who made you WANT to be with them for the rest of your life. You meet that person, you feel that love you never knew you could feel and it becomes that marriage is the happiest thing that could happen, and being alone would be torture.

the truth

- submitted by Anonymous on 02/17/2009

I like women for tits, ass, and pussy. Otherwise I can't stand them.

Marriage archaic?

- submitted by Anonymous on 02/17/2009

Lol. Think marriage is archaic guy makes some good points and I like his honesty. I think as humans we don't generally have the emotional stability to stand alone. Whilst marriage does cut the "partying" down and generally makes us more boring it does keep us more sane if we need it. It's a toss up and I don't think anyone should be disrespected for believing either way.

Re: Marriage is not archaic

- submitted by Anonymous on 02/17/2009

"My parents have been married for 30 years and are still disgustingly in love and very happy. I feel sad for you because you have obviously never met someone who made you WANT to be with them for the rest of your life. You meet that person, you feel that love you never knew you could feel and it becomes that marriage is the happiest thing that could happen, and being alone would be torture."

====================

OK, a little bluntness: to be in a long term relationship, you have to stay stupid. If you learn, change and grow, then it's almost impossible to stay together, because 2 people will have different interests, different aptitudes and will naturally grow apart. Your parents are probably dull, boring, low IQ homebodies who just sit around at home, watch TV, hang out with other parent couples, and spend too much time in a never ending melodrama with the relatives.

I don't want to organize my life around another person's interests, schedule and aptitudes. Couples have to compromise on almost everything and that limits their options severely. Plus to get really good at something requires lots of time alone. I play piano, paint/draw, bike 50miles/day, lift weights, and compose music.... so there's no time for a woman in my life, and I would RESENT it greatly if I had to cut into my quality time to merely spend it with some women doing nothing. Most couples I know, all they have in common is food and sex. Recently, I started learning how to program in C++, try using that as excuse why you can't spend time together. I wouldn't be able to learn it if I was in a relationship, there just isn't enough time in the day.

My self-esteem is based on my abilities, things I know and skills I've developed. Greatness happens alone. And what I value in life is experiences, which would be much fewer and much of a much narrower range if I had a girlfriend.

Plus women are expensive, and even though I earn a decent salary (over 100K) she would probably give me grief when I buy something expensive, like the new bicycle I just bought for $9,200. And children are waaaaaaaay way way expensive... children = poverty. With a woman spending a large chunk of my salary and the kids eating the rest, where would I be with all my interests? I wouldn't have been able to go travel with the amgen tour of california (like I am now), wouldn't be able to afford top-of-the-line bikes, and worst of all: they would consume my time so much that I would be reduced to a meager existence of work, family and sleep. You might as well kill me if that happened, literally. I approach things very methodically: cold and calculated, because my very existence depends on it. For example, I had myself fixed just after I turned 21, and I know that if I had a girlfriend a little bit of me would die. My quality of life is great because I am alone, and you might as well kill than put me in a relationship, because I can't continue developing my talents... and that is the same thing as death. I can live without all my toys and without just about anything else, except that which is life itself: my ability to learn and create.

Re: Marriage is not archaic

- submitted by Anonymous on 02/17/2009

Dude, there are pros and cons to everything. Marriage doesn't have to mean giving up your interests it can mean expanding them, sharing them, developing new ones. It's what you both make of it.

If marriage is not for you fine but if you are so happy why be so negative about other people choosing marriage? Don't buy it, you protest to much.

aren't you guys thinking a

- submitted by Anonymous on 02/17/2009

aren't you guys thinking a little too into this?...jeez lol

I agree with you (the

- submitted by Anonymous on 02/17/2009

I agree with you (the anti-relationship-guy), however I approach it from a different angle. I am a lifestyle Dominant. I am actually a lot more than that, but I don't want to go into the extent of it because it skirts the "law" somewhat. Just know that there are many women more than willing (consenting) to give up their consent. Consetual non-consent. They wish to be what you want them to be. They wish to see you happy, and it is the entire reason for their existance. Pleasing you becomes their purpose in life, and that includes seeing you happy with other women, or seeing you happy with her and other women (or even men). It doesn't matter, for all they care about is whether they have pleased you or not.

No jealousy, no prejudice, no drama, because it is would be a reflection of a sense of identity and pridefulness, that which they do not want. Pridefulness is scorned in the lifestyle, it is the trait that generally roots anything that could cause problems between you and the other person. It always comes back to pride. We live in an age of entitlement. That cannot be denied. It doesn't mean we have to participate. There are those that think like I do, and there are women that are just as disgusted with how feminism has skewed the system towards women in such a degree. Some of these women just want to serve you, see you happy, however, the crux is that you must be strong, for you are going to have to show your strength in how you discipline them, how you keep them under control, however, when a regular couple fight, the fight can last for days, and grudges are held by women for years. In my lifestyle, mistakes are paid for through punishment, and since debt has been paid, the issue is over. Simple. I can choose to reward them, or I can choose to use them, I can choose to let them go, I can choose their path in my relationship, and I certainly can choose my interests over them. My job is not to entertain, nor is it to read minds. I have a goal, and I reach out and achieve it. If there is a woman that wishes to serve me during this period, then she may, and if I choose to enjoy the company of someone else, I may, and I do not need permission to enjoy those that serve. I direct my life, and theirs, if it is what they want. There are many women that understand there is freedom within bondage, a freedom that a modern career-driven woman will never know. Free from responsibility, free from prejudice and jealousy, freedom from feminine (and non) drama. If I am happy, she is happy. Simple as that. It is all she wants. It is all they want.

This might seem as though the man has it all and the woman nothing, but remeber, their need is to please. It is just as strong as my need to take and enjoy. Both parties are getting eactly what they want. If someone wishes to live a life where they never need to worry about what to do, to give up their consent to another, this power exchange can be one of the closest bonds one can have with another, and yet at the same time, there is nothing stopping you from enjoying whatever it is that you wish to enjoy, even if it involves others. The requirement is that you have the means to give them what they need. I have a good career, I make more than enough to support who I decide to bring into my life. They wish to see me happy, so time, otherwise spent doing the typical relationsip "duty" is replaced by my interests and hobbies. Often my interests will coincide with theirs. They may wish to feel pain as much as I wish to give it. They may wish to feel isolated as much as I wish to isolate. They may wish to be humiliated as much as I wish to humiliate, and they may wish to just serve and please as much as I wish to be served and pleased. Pleased does not always include them, and they know this.

I am not trying to say it is easy. Just as with anything in life, you get out what you put in, however, it is a very rewarding way to, both have the company of another woman, and not have to give up that which interests you.

It is not for everyone, you have to be strong, you have to have a solid foundation in life, and like one of the previoous posters have said, you should also feel just as strong alone as you are with anyone. It doesn't mean you need to be alone, however, you cannot use a woman, a relationship, as a crutch in life, or else you really are going to end up part of that system he loaths so much. You cannot be afraid to say goodbye if something does not work out, and you cannot be of a weak character, for the object is to not need to compromise, and in fact, the object is to not even want to. You set your sights on a goal, and you achieve it.

It is more than possible to have this today. It is true about family court. Having a penis is automatically a disadvantage, however, there are women that understand this, disagree with it, and do not wish to be part of that system. There are women that loath it just as much as we do, and they are more than accutely aware of the bialogical differenced in the sexes, and accept their role in service to you. They just won't serve a man that does not deserve it, or one that cannot give them what they need, as in doesn't have the balls to stand up and take what they feel is theirs. The more you take the more they will loook up to you, and it does not make them weak willed.

You will not find a weak willed woman capable of serving in this way. The typical married life is for a weak. It is not some prerequisite path that everyone must take. I am happy that there are people today that are beginning to understand this, however I do not see the law changing anytime soon, so to live this life, one needs to be patient and strong, for there will be a time when you may be alone, and there will be time when you may need to help several. Either way, they understand that your desires are their desires. Period. They know their place, because it is where you placed them. They will not serve any man unable to stand up for himself.

You ever wonder why that asshole in highschool had all the girlfriends and you didn't? This is why.

There is a biological factor involved. It is non-intuitive, but yes, mr. no married guy up there, I am certain that he has no problem fulfilling his needs, nor do I.

To Anonymous

- submitted by Anonymous on 02/17/2009

You're pathetic existence seems to be the personification of selfishness. The legacy you will leave behind in this life is your bicycle collection, a few paintings and maybe a piano? But whom will you leave it to? Who will attend your funeral? Do you intend to bike 50 miles a day and lift weights until the day you die? The pitiful oversight in your self indulgent life plan is that you are setting yourself up for a very lonely existence. And all to protect your pitiful 100K salary? All that self indulgence and that's what you have to show for it? It must upset you to see individuals probably 10 years younger making double your income and marrying beautiful, intelligent women able to support themselves better then you're doing. Enjoy that fancy bicycle, it seems to be the only thing going for you.

Who will he leave it to? Who

- submitted by Anonymous on 02/17/2009

Who will he leave it to? Who will attend his funeral? Who cares? He'll be dead.

Your precious ideals are nothing more than a glossy finish over your natural instincts to reproduce.

I'm happy on my own as well, I don't need another person to validate my existence, you have a very narrow world view.

"Who will he leave it to?

- submitted by Anonymous on 02/17/2009

"Who will he leave it to? Who will attend his funeral? Who cares? He'll be dead.

Your precious ideals are nothing more than a glossy finish over your natural instincts to reproduce.

I'm happy on my own as well, I don't need another person to validate my existence, you have a very narrow world view."

You people make me laugh, you think those of us that want relationships are the ones with the narrow world view? Who's the exception here? Lots of us, like myself, have found women with equally passionate goals and aspirations in life. Along we will accomplish more then your pathetic 100K and fancy bicycles, but together we will produce exponentially more resources to pursue what we want, in whatever comfort we want. Oh, and yes, we'll have children when we're ready so that we produce more to show for our lives then our liquid assets. Your existence is pathetic.

Wow...

- submitted by Anonymous on 02/17/2009

The anti-marriage guy is either young or borderline retarded, cuz he is freakin responding to every comment and has no idea what he is talking about. (Sorry, for canceling out my previous comment about him responding to comments) but the guy above me is right:

"As if anyone on this shitty blog is a relationships expert, let alone qualified to decide whether or not someone's "existence is pathetic..."

however relationship "experts" are a joke

sure they are married?

- submitted by Anonymous on 02/17/2009

they might not be married and he might just be throwing her out.

It was awesome

- submitted by Frank on 02/17/2009

Yeah I slept with your honey, and it was awesome! Oh and btw she doesn't NEED to stay in your house anymore because she's now living in my $500Million mansion. Of course I fully intend to throw her out sometime before Common-Law sets in, but most likely next weekend. One of the benefits of being so wealthy is the ability to trade in for a younger model. Anyways, see you suckers later.

A system could not well have

- submitted by Anonymous on 02/17/2009

A system could not well have been devised more studiously hostile to human happiness than marriage.

[ Percy Bysshe Shelley ]

The purpose of love, sex, and marriage is the production and raising of children. But look about you: most people have no business having children. They are unqualified, either genetically or culturally or both, to reproduce such sorry specimens as themselves. Of all our privileges, the license to breed is the most grossly abused.

[ Edward Abbey ]

The chains of love are so heavy it take two to carry them, sometimes three.

[ Alexander Dumas ]

Marriage is based on the theory that when a man discovers a particular brand of beer exactly to his taste he should at once throw up his job and go to work in the brewery.

[ George Jean Nathan ]

The bitterest creature under heaven is the wife who discovers that her husband's bravery is only bravado, that his strength is only a uniform, that his power is but a gun in the hands of a fool.

[ Pearl S. Buck ]

The bachelor is a peacock, the engaged man a lion, and the married man, a jackass.

[ German Proverb ]

One of the most visible effects of a child's presence in the household is to turn the worthy parents into complete idiots when, without him, they would perhaps have remained mere imbeciles.

[ Georges Courteline ]

To make the child in your own image is a capital crime, for your image is not worth repeating. The child knows this and you know it. Consequently you hate each other.

[ Karl Shapiro ]

I believe that more unhappiness comes from the family than any other source. From the attempt to prolong family connections unduly and to make people hang together artificially who would never naturally do so.

[ Samuel Butler ]

The family! Home of all social evils, a charitable institution for indolent women, a prison workshop for the breadwinner and a hell for children.

[ August Strindberg ]

Sacred family! The supposed home of all the virtues, where innocent children are tortured into their first falsehoods, where wills are broken by parental tyranny, and self-respect smothered by crowded, jostling egos.

[ August Strindberg ]

A man can be himself only so long as he is alone; and, if he does not love solitude, he will not love freedom; for it is only when he is alone that he is really free.

[ Arthur Schopenhauer ]

Marriage and virginity was invented by men with small penises. They want exclusivity because they would not compare favorably if a woman knew what she was missing.

[ Kenda Soboda ]

To dare to live alone is the rarest courage; since there are many who had rather meet their bitterest enemy in the field, than their own hearts in their closet.

[ Charles Caleb Colton ]

Whenever I hear someone talking about leaving something for prosperity, or breeding children to continue his legacy, I know for a fact that he is a complete loser who has achieved nothing in his life, except the mundane task of finding an even more pathetic loser with whom to breed. They paint their union as something special, but it's just two pigs fucking in the dark.

In the end nothing we do matters because life on earth will cease, the sun will explode crumbling it to dust, and all that happened here will vanish as if it had never happened. Throughout the universe there have been billions of planets with life where great races lived and died. As we are incapable of contacting them, there will be billions more who will be incapable of contacting us. For even if sapient life existed on earth for another hundred thousand years, it would be an imperceptible blip in the history of time which is about 14 billion years so far, and the distances are so vast between the stars that even if our radio signals do reach a world capable of detecting them, we will have long vanished by the time they receive our transmissions. So each of us will live out our time no better than anyone else, but at least I can say that I've risen above the leprosy of my biology, became aware of the futility of existence, and turned it to my advantage instead of being constrained to the destiny of my genetics and living life as a cog in the gears of my DNA.

If I lived a thousand lifetimes, I would never repeat what I did previously, but one thing I would never do is procreate because that is the existence of a mindless worm. All you breeders are worthless pieces of shit who fill the world with stupidity, poverty and make this planet a living hell.

These stupid peasants, who throughout the world, hold potentates on their thrones, make statesmen illustrious, provide generals with lasting victories, all with ignorance, indifferences, or half-witted hatred, moving the world with the strength of their arms, and getting their heads knocked together, in the name of god, the king, or the stock exchange - immortal, dreaming, hopeless asses, who surrender their reason to the care of a shining puppet, and persuade some toy to carry their lives in his purse.

[ Stephen Crane ]

SINGLE FOR LIFE

- submitted by Anonymous on 02/17/2009

I'M SINGLE FOR LIFE AND YES THAT MAKES ME BETTER THAN YOU MARRIED PRETARDS.

SUCK IT BITCHES

Wow - lot of teenaged,

- submitted by Kit on 02/17/2009

Wow - lot of teenaged, basement-dwelling misanthropes in this thread, eh?

Modern women are heartless

- submitted by Anonymous on 02/17/2009

Modern women are heartless and superficial.

The Marriage Strike is

- submitted by Anonymous on 02/17/2009

The Marriage Strike is rising. All men need to join this movement.

yeah! boycott marriage

- submitted by Anonymous on 02/17/2009

what are these bitchez gonna do when they have nobody to pay their rent hahaha

@The Marriage Strike

- submitted by Anonymous on 02/17/2009

>The Marriage Strike is rising.

In the last census, for the first time ever, the number of single people was greater then the number of married people. It is becoming a movement. We are now the majority.

I think it's fun that the

- submitted by Anonymous on 02/17/2009

I think it's fun that the closet women haters have come out to play. Tell us how you really feel, boys. Better yet, tell us to our faces, so we know whom to avoid.

A recent federal report indicated that as a result of job losses over the last couple of months, women now hold more jobs in the US than men do. We're getting better grades, going to better colleges, and now we're more likely to have a job.

Maybe it's YOUR rent you should be worried about.

Loudon Wainwright

- submitted by Anonymous on 02/17/2009

There's a song by Loudon Wainwright that goes

god I hate women, they mess up your life I'll kill your mother, and you kill my wife

I should have been more

- submitted by Anonymous on 02/17/2009

I should have been more clear:

"We're getting better grades _than men_, going to better colleges _than men_, and now we're more likely to have a job _than men_."

Fixed.

@bitter bitch

- submitted by Anonymous on 02/17/2009

>women now hold more jobs in the US than men do

good, i always love it when the guy in the relationship is the deadbeat instead of the woman.

now iron my shirt, and cook some dinner. bitch

and get me a beer